Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Fog or Confusion?

When a hand grenade lands in your midst, one of the surest ways to save your buddies (and become a hero), is to dive on it. The left has lobbed a grenade into our Armed Forces that no one dares dive on, no matter how much carnage it might prevent. 

That grenade rolling around in the midst of the Army nowadays is deliberately designed to feminize, neuter, emasculate and pacify our military.  The ongoing social tinkering is not designed to produce a Frankenstein – it’s designed to produce a Michael Jackson.  The left knows they can control Mike a lot easier than Frank.  And that’s their ultimate objective; “control” the military.  Control is their goal – not combat effectiveness.

The three main axis of advance for the left are; 1) force the homosexual issue, 2) force women into male roles/units, and 3) get rid of those bigoted and pesky Christians.  First axis – check, objective accomplished.  Second objective -- underway.  The third one, they can’t even admit it’s an objective.  The left knows that one who is committed to the King of kings won’t cave to their carnality. After all, it was Jesus himself who said, “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’”


The collateral damage from the left’s grenade may only now be evident.  This month the Department of Defense released its annual Sexual Assault Report .  A Military Times article about the report opened with this, “Across the military, men suffered more sexual assaults last year than women…”  The report itself said, “From 2012 to 2013, there was an unprecedented 53% increase in victim reports of sexual assault.  In 2014, the high level of reporting seen in 2013 was sustained with 6,131 reports of sexual assault. This figure represents an increase of 11% over 2013 numbers.”  DoD's Dr. Nathan Galbreath explained, "Men, relative to women, are more often experiencing multiple sexual assault incidents throughout the year. They are at the hands of multiple offenders. These occur in daytime hours in their duty locations."  Exactly whose bright idea was all this again?

In 1896, Clausewitz described “The Fog of War” as, "the state of ignorance in which commanders frequently find themselves as regards the real strength and position, not only of their foes, but also of their friends."  Politicians now use the term to excuse and mask their poor decisions; blaming their blunders on a “fog” that was really brought about by their own ideological blinders.  The newest liberal “fog” is complete gender confusion on every front.   

To advance the left’s second objective the “women in Ranger school” experiment is underway.  If they can demonstrate that a woman can pass what has been called the "toughest combat course in the world" and "most physically and mentally demanding leadership school the Army has to offer"  there will be no reason to maintain the exclusion of women from any job or any unit. 

From 2000 – 2012, the historically male-only Ranger School graduation rate was under 49%.  The results thus far for the ongoing gender-bending class:  381 males and 19 females started the course; 184 men and eight women passed the initial four-day Ranger assessment.   All eight of the women and 69 of the males then failed the first of the three phases (Darby, Mountains and Florida).  Their second chance at the Darby Phase began 14 May 2015.   

Perhaps the only two things more confused than our Armed Force’s gender policies: Bruce Jenner trying to decide which restroom to use and the left trying to figure out how he could be a Republican.
 
One day a woman may become a “Ranger” -- but she’ll never be a man.  

May the fog lift soon. 
 
This article was published in the 20 May 2015 Upson Beacon.  Full disclosure.  I am a Ranger Class 13-87 graduate.  My son and I both served in the 75th Ranger Regiment.  I also served in the Ranger Training Brigade.   

3 comments:

  1. Thank you, Colonel, for your unwavering stance that is anchored to the moral absolutes of Scripture (Mark 10:5-7, Romans 1:26-28). What has changed? Surely NOT the moral absolutes of God. I understand the dark strategy that distorts the truth, trying (and succeeding) to make the objection to homosexuality sound like racial bigotry. If there were no damaging consequences for embracing this lifestyle so clearly opposed to God's order and ordinance, we could all pretend that the debate was merely an academic exchange of ideas which ought to be equally tolerated. But this is not the case, as you have clearly demonstrated, Colonel, by the unprecedented sexual violence correlated with the "fog" of this confusion. We see this, not only by such recent reports, but also by the long history of the moral decline of the nations before us who have followed the sad template described in Romans 1:25-27 regarding those "who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet." When the "fog" clears, we will see the irreversible damage that we have caused, not by a harmless exchange of ideas, but by the impact of exchanging the truth for a lie. Thank you for the clarity of your voice in this critical matter, Colonel. May fog lift soon, as you have said, while there is yet hope for our nation's revival. -2 Chronicles 7:14

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree Colonel, and thank you. An army is only as strong as its weakest link, and to have “links” within the ranks of emotionally strong men (with the mindset of a “Male” instinct of the utmost confidence within himself) that cannot carry on with the strength of the mission, has doomed the mission from the start. That is why from the basic entrance into the military ALL soldiers are a team and must perform as a team. If you have a member of that team with homosexual tendencies, the emotional stability is doomed to fail.
    I’m not saying that the military has no room for homosexuals, as to the fact that they must be kept in the back lines doing supportive roles away from combat ready forces and Special Operations. It would go the same for female soldiers. If they cannot maintain the same strength and readiness in the role of a frontline soldier, they should be kept in supporting role. Again, this does not apply to those that maintain as frontline soldiers do, only to those unable to maintain. Thanks again for your opinion, and for reading mine.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you sir for this article! It would have bee my honor to serve under you . Rangers lead the way !
    Regards,
    Gerard

    ReplyDelete