For some reason, I have been gripped by the topic
of “invasive species” for the last few days.
Down here in the south, the example of kudzu immediately comes to
mind. The UN Council on Bio Diversity
defines an invasive species as, “a plant or animal that is not native to a
specific location; and has a tendency to spread, which is believed to cause
damage to the environment, human economy and/or human health.”
The European Union uses the term "Invasive Alien
Species." One doesn’t need to be a
recent graduate of our modern academic system to realize just how offensive and
politically incorrect the term "Invasive Alien Species" could
be. In fact, two researchers, Robert I.
Colautti and Hugh J. MacIsaac in a paper titled, “A Neutral Terminology to Define ‘Invasive’
Species” come to the aid of those
oppressed aliens.
Their paper’s abstract explains, “The use of simple terms to
articulate ecological concepts can confuse ideological debates and undermine
management efforts. This problem is particularly acute in studies of
nonindigenous species, which alternatively have been called ‘exotic’,
‘introduced’, ‘invasive’ and ‘naturalised’, among others…” Instead they, “propose a neutral
terminology.” Perhaps they should be
called “undocumented species” or “uninvited, but welcome anyways species” or
“refugee species.” Some species were
probably brought here by their parents, through no fault of their own – some
might call that species a “dreamer”
perhaps.
Dr. David Tilman finds, “Typically, an introduced
species must survive at low population densities before it becomes invasive in
a new location.” Then there is a “tipping
point” where the invasive species becomes a problem. However, this doesn’t just happen; there are
preconditions that make an ecosystem susceptible to invasion. The Department of Agriculture insightfully
explains, “Invaded
ecosystems may have experienced disturbance, typically human-induced. Such a disturbance may give invasive species
a chance to establish themselves with less competition from natives less able
to adapt to a disturbed ecosystem.” In the case of the American ecosystem, that
disturbance is the result of unconstitutional executive actions.
And the invasion will continue unabated for the foreseeable
future. The Washington Examiner reports,
“Legal
and illegal immigrants will hit a record high of 51 million in just eight years
and eventually account for an astounding 82 percent of all population growth in
America, according to new U.S. Census figures.”
The Center for
Immigration Studies analysis of the new Census says, “These numbers have
important implications for workers, schools, infrastructure, congestion and the
environment…They also may have implications for our ability to successfully
assimilate and integrate immigrants. Yet there has been almost no national
debate about bringing in so many people..."
There was a President
that unashamedly loved America; he described her using the metaphor Jesus used
in His Sermon on the Mount. In his farewell speech to the nation,
Ronald Reagan said, “I've spoken of the shining city all my
political life, but I don't know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I
said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than
oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in
harmony and peace…”
In that same speech, Reagan warned us that it was effectual assimilation
that would prevent an invasion from leading to annihilation. He cautioned, “An informed patriotism is what we
want…are we doing a good enough job teaching our children what America is and
what she represents in the long history of the world?...freedom is special and
rare. It's fragile; it needs protection.” Social scientists define successful
assimilation as “new
members of a society become indistinguishable from members of the other group.”
Immediately before His “City on a Hill”
illustration, Jesus told his followers,
“You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it
be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out
and trampled underfoot.”
If our country is going to be preserved, Americans must pour
on the salt. No matter how irritating
some might find it.
This column also appears in the 29 APR 2015 Upson Beacon. |
Amen, Colonel. Your illustration is particularly poignant to me, as earlier this month (April 13, 2015), as I was beginning to speak at a Rescue Mission here in San Diego (God's Extended Hand), I was attacked with a salt shaker (which was on the table where the food would be served after the sermon). The attacker was remarkably accurate and forceful, as the large salt shaker broke on the back of my head (since I was able to turn before the impact), requiring five staples in the emergency room. The offending statement that prompted the assailant to throw the mug-sized salt shaker at me was simply a Scripture quoted from John 8:31-32: "Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on Him, If ye continue in My word, then are ye My disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." The sermon continued, but to a different audience (to the medical team and police officers). Today I was able to return to this mission and expound on the truth that was interrupted by the paramedic team and the police taking statements about what took place. The truth instructs and heals those who receive it. The truth inflames and hurts those who reject it. Thank you, Colonel, for these timely articles that are much needed for healing, though the truth of Scripture may offend the hearts who need it most in our day.
ReplyDelete